Citi Field review

I should begin this post by mentioning that I never went to architectural school and I don’t know the difference between a column, a pillar, a colonnade, or a buttress.  Frank Lloyd Wright, I am not.

But, that being said … I’m enjoying my first look at Citi Field.   The Mets new ballpark cost a bunch; $800 million is the figure that they mention.  That’s a lot of girders and beams.  But in between there are some really cool touches.

I made it to the ballpark early today so I could walk around the park.  And there’s a lot to see.
The Mets have always tried to keep in touch with the New York baseball teams that have moved away.  The Brooklyn Dodgers and the New York Giants (their Blue and Orange color scheme is a nod to Dodger Blue and the burnt orange worn by the Giants).  The Mets are keeping up with the tradition at Citi Field.

The exterior of Citi is supposed to be similar to Brooklyn’s Ebbets Field.  Our TV Producer Brad Zager dug up a picture of Ebbets for the broadcast Wednesday and they really did match things up pretty well.   Lots of brick, limestone and granite … with huge arched windows all the way around the outside.  A big difference between the two parks though is the location.  Ebbets was formed by the city streets that surrounded it in a crowded Brooklyn neighborhood.  Citi Field is surrounded by a parking lot, with the Arthur Ashe Tennis Center a couple of forehands away.

When you first walk into Citi Field there is an entry-way behind home-plate that is called the Jackie Robinson Rotunda.   The area is a shrine to Jackie with photos, quotes, and his career timeline.   The rotunda is supposed to be similar to the rotunda at Ebbets.   (I’ve never used the word ‘rotunda’ before). There are dangling lights just like at Ebbets and an escalator to get people to the main level of the ballpark.  It’s a different type of entrance to a ballpark.

Unusual … but good.

The grandstand seats are dark green similar to the color of the seats at the old Polo Grounds where the Giants used to play.  The left field wall is 16 feet high in certain areas and is painted black with an orange trim … like the outfield wall at the Polo Grounds.

There are massive bridges and archways that are painted black that add to the character of the ball park.

Talking with a couple of people here at the park, the only real beef I heard was that there is very little that links the park to the Mets and their time at Shea Stadium.  But for me?  Who cares?  This place is a looker.  And, where else can you watch a ballgame and get a knish as well?

I guess my only real complaint is that after spending $800 million they should’ve ponied up an extra $50 bucks and created a map to hand out to visitors. Over the last three days I explored a large part of the ballpark unintentionally in my quest to find my way back to the press box.

Besides that … I’m a fan.

Gotta go.  I just saw Dodger Head Trainer Stan Conte throwing a football around with injured first baseman Doug Mientkiewicz.  What’s that all about?


  1. fawnkyjunk

    Hello Fellas,
    Im stuck at work and listening to Rick on the radio today. While listening to him he mentioned that Livan Hernandez calls his changeup a “bugs bunny change”. Rick didnt sound like he knew what that meant. Could you please show this to him:

    Thanks and keep up the good work
    erik in l.a.

  2. booboochen

    I’m vacationing in NYC and have tickets to see the Mets play the Rockies. As an Angeleno I’ll be rooting for the Amazins to beat our NL West rivals. I hope they let fans in early to check out the park. I went to about 50 games at Shea and it was a dump but I always enjoyed the ride out on the 7 train. Now as a Dodger season ticket holder I love the Ravine. I’m enjoying reading your blog. Keep up the great road stories.

  3. crzblue2

    Wait a minute! Who wrote this, Psycho or Collins? Anyway, thanks for the review and I’ll remember to have a map handy when I go.
    I am also a season ticket holder and also LOVE the Ravine!!


    I love going visiting other stadiums as much as any baseball fan, but I can’t help but feel like Dodger Stadium is perfect every time I go. It’s definitely not the nicest stadium I’ve visited. I doubt it’s anywhere near as nice as New Yankee Stadium or Citi Field. Dodger Stadium is perfect, but could be so much better. I think it would be really cool if the Dodgers tore down Dodger Stadium and built a new stadium in the same location. The Dodgers can play at the Colosseum during the construction years, as sort of a limited-time throw back thing that could make a ton of money. The bleachers need to be torn down and replaced with actual seats, but keeping the low profile and angled rooftops that have been a signature of the stadium would the picturesque view of the mountains would be critical. Parking could be moved into parking structures around the stadium allowing some of the land around the stadium to be developed into shopping, restaurants, and bars. Investing in Dodgertown would be a great idea and a nice reward for a city of patient, loyal fans…. of course investing in starting pitching this week would make for a nicer reward come October.

  5. beachteen

    I dont think Citi field should haev a rotunda honouring Jackie Robinson when he was never on their team. He was on our team. Every ball park has their thankful nod 2 Jackie, but a whole rotunda? That is strange because that rotunda should be at our stadium honouuring our own player.
    & Dodgers,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s